01 · Executive Summary
This page converts the relationship map into a concise due-diligence intelligence summary suitable for case review and evidence organization.
The supplied materials describe a reported ecosystem involving DayHub, VeoMarkets, and Scalway. The map treats DayHub as a reported project or company node, VeoMarkets as the broker-facing node, and Scalway as an alleged education or onboarding pathway linked to trading promotion and conversion activity.[1] [3]
The principal persons identified in the supplied mapping are Dominik Pasler, Marcin Makarowski, Adrian Łojek, and Marcin Olinkiewicz. The mapping also records Tonjaka Hinkson and Sebastian Kałka as contextual names because the supplied narrative identifies them in VeoMarkets-related photographic context; this does not prove formal ownership, management, employment, or operational control.[1] [2]
02 · DayHub Entity
DayHub is treated as a core reported relationship node, not as a formally adjudicated participant.
In the supplied source map, Dayhub.io is described as a blockchain-based project linked to overlapping leadership and previously connected to blockchain-funded account activity that reportedly ended after client losses.[3] The approved mapping identifies DayHub as linked to Dominik Pasler, Marcin Makarowski, Adrian Łojek, VeoMarkets, and Scalway.[1]
| Indicator | Mapping Treatment |
|---|---|
| Reported leadership connection | Dominik Pasler is reported as a co-founder or CEO-linked figure for DayHub and also connected by clients to VeoMarkets leadership or onboarding. |
| Reported operational bridge | Marcin Makarowski is reported as linked to DayHub and connected to VeoMarkets leadership or onboarding; possible spelling variants require confirmation. |
| Reported pathway connection | Adrian Łojek is reported as linked to DayHub and Scalway, making him relevant to the alleged DayHub–Scalway pathway. |
03 · Key Persons (KYC)
KYC-style cards separate operationally described persons from contextual names that require identity and role verification.
Reported as a DayHub co-founder or CEO-linked figure and described by clients as connected to VeoMarkets leadership or onboarding.
Reported as linked to DayHub and connected to VeoMarkets leadership or onboarding. The similar spelling “Marcin Makowski” should be treated as a possible variant requiring confirmation.
Reported as linked to DayHub and Scalway and relevant to the alleged pathway between the project environment and education/onboarding activity.
Reported as a promoter or marketer directing attention toward VeoMarkets and connected to private-channel or education-style solicitation associated with Scalway.
Named in supplied narrative material as appearing in VeoMarkets-related photographs. Inclusion reflects contextual association only.
Named in supplied narrative material as appearing in VeoMarkets-related photographs. Inclusion reflects contextual association only.
04 · Scalway History
Scalway is framed as a reported education, onboarding, or conversion-pathway node in the supplied mapping.
The supplied mapping describes Scalway as a related entity or platform involved in the educational or onboarding side of the funnel, with Adrian Łojek identified as a key figure in that environment.[3] The approved relationship document maps Scalway to Adrian Łojek, Marcin Olinkiewicz, DayHub, and VeoMarkets.[1]
For due-diligence purposes, the key question is whether Scalway functioned merely as an education or community channel, or whether it formed part of a coordinated funnel that converted prospects toward VeoMarkets account creation, deposit activity, or private-channel trading solicitation.
| Scalway Relationship Point | Person / Entity | Verification Needed |
|---|---|---|
| Reported direct association | Adrian Łojek | Confirm corporate, platform, channel, and communications records. |
| Reported education/private-channel funnel | Marcin Olinkiewicz | Review social-media posts, Zoom records, Telegram/WhatsApp invitations, and deposit instructions. |
| Reported pathway toward VeoMarkets | VeoMarkets | Identify referral links, onboarding records, CRM data, and account-opening paths. |
| Reported overlap with DayHub | DayHub | Confirm whether personnel, tools, domains, marketing, or business records overlap. |
05 · Network Map
The network map visualizes reported connections among the six named individuals and the three core entities.
| From | To | Reported Relationship Type | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| DayHub | VeoMarkets | Reported leadership or operating overlap. | Verify |
| Scalway | VeoMarkets | Reported education or onboarding funnel into brokerage activity. | Review |
| Scalway | DayHub | Reported connection through Adrian Łojek and broader network overlap. | Verify |
| Dominik Pasler | DayHub / VeoMarkets | Reported DayHub leadership link and VeoMarkets onboarding or context connection. | Review |
| Marcin Makarowski | DayHub / VeoMarkets | Reported DayHub link and VeoMarkets leadership or onboarding connection. | Priority |
| Adrian Łojek | DayHub / Scalway | Reported connection to DayHub and Scalway. | Review |
| Marcin Olinkiewicz | VeoMarkets / Scalway | Reported promotional and education/private-channel funnel connection. | Priority |
| Tonjaka Hinkson | VeoMarkets | Reported photographic/contextual association. | Verify |
| Sebastian Kałka | VeoMarkets | Reported photographic/contextual association. | Verify |
06 · Red Flags
The red flags combine supplied evidence, public-source background, and relationship-pattern indicators.
Rankia Poland reports that VEO Markets appeared on the market in November 2025, is registered in Saint Lucia as an IBC, and lacks a recognized financial-regulator licence in Poland or the EU. Rankia also notes that an IBC registration is a commercial registration rather than authorization to provide investment services.[4]
WikiFX lists the VeoMarkets profile as not regulated and identifies veomarkets.com in its broker profile, which provides supplementary due-diligence context rather than conclusive legal findings.[5]
The source materials describe a funnel beginning with social-media promotion and private education/community channels, followed by account creation or deposit activity connected to VeoMarkets.[3] Rankia similarly describes recruitment through Telegram or WhatsApp groups presented as a free trading academy, followed by account-opening and deposit encouragement.[4]
Additional red flags include reported withdrawal blocking, alleged removal of USD 4,020.21 in account profit under a “GAP Trading” rationale, limited transparency on platform/software details, and claims involving high or “unlimited” leverage.[3] [4] [6]
| Red Flag | Why It Matters | Evidence Basis | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offshore broker-facing registration | Offshore company registration may not equal financial authorization for retail brokerage services. | Rankia public article; internal package references. | High |
| Private-channel recruitment | Telegram, WhatsApp, Zoom, or closed-group funnels reduce transparency and increase evidentiary importance of screenshots and recordings. | Source map; Rankia article; supplied narrative. | Critical |
| Withdrawal or profit-removal allegations | Blocking withdrawals or removing profit is a major consumer-harm indicator requiring account-level audit. | Account-history summary and package materials. | Critical |
| Opaque leadership and role attribution | Named individuals require KYC, ownership, management, and communications verification. | Approved mapping and supplied materials. | High |
| Context-only named persons | Photo-context names should not be overstated but should be preserved for identity confirmation. | Supplied narrative and approved mapping. | Medium |
07 · Timeline
The timeline organizes available events and source anchors. Dates should be treated as evidence-management markers unless independently verified.
Rankia reports that WHOIS analysis confirmed registration of the veomarkets.com domain on 18 November 2025.[4]
Rankia reports that VEO Markets appeared on the market in November 2025 and generated concern due to licensing, recruitment, and withdrawal-related allegations.[4]
Rankia describes a documented case in which a user reportedly generated profit, then funds were removed and withdrawal became impossible; this should be cross-checked against account records and communications evidence.[4]
Rankia Poland published a public article describing VeoMarkets as a broker without licence and discussing recruitment through messaging groups, trading-offer red flags, and withdrawal complaints.[4]
The supplied relationship map and this clickable category mapping were prepared as evidence-organization materials for the DayHub, VeoMarkets, and Scalway relationship review.[1]
08 · Recommendations
These recommendations are practical due-diligence steps designed to strengthen the evidence file without overstating unverified allegations.
Verify the full legal names, aliases, social-media handles, corporate roles, beneficial ownership, directorships, and communications identifiers for each named person. Prioritize Dominik Pasler, Marcin Makarowski, Adrian Łojek, and Marcin Olinkiewicz because the supplied materials describe operational or funnel-related roles for those individuals.[1] [3]
Preserve original screenshots, videos, chat exports, account statements, transaction receipts, domain records, group-invitation links, and withdrawal correspondence. Each item should be assigned a filename, date, source, hash where possible, and short description so the evidence can be independently reviewed later.
Cross-match deposits, withdrawal requests, profit-removal entries, platform logs, IP/session records, and payment references. The alleged USD 4,020.21 profit-removal event should be treated as a high-priority account-level item requiring reconciliation with statements and correspondence.[6]
Before external submission, have counsel or a qualified compliance professional review the wording, evidence exhibits, translations, and annex numbering. Contextual names should remain clearly separated from persons alleged to have operational roles.
| No. | Source | Use in Mapping |
|---|---|---|
| [1] | Approved mapping source: Interconnected_Activities_Mapping_VeoMarkets_DayHub.md | Core entities, named persons, connection matrix, and cautious wording. |
| [2] | User-supplied narrative: pasted_content.txt | Additional names, public links, and photo-context references. |
| [3] | Source map: 04_Fraud_Network_Map.md | Operational-methodology allegations, key persons, and funnel structure. |
| [4] | Rankia Poland — VEO Markets Opinie 2026: broker bez licencji? | Public background on licensing concerns, recruitment, domain timing, trading-offer red flags, and withdrawal complaints. |
| [5] | WikiFX — VeoMarkets dealer profile | Supplementary broker-profile and public due-diligence context. |
| [6] | Account-history and package summary: report_history_summary.md | Account-level context for the reported USD 4,020.21 profit-removal dispute and supporting evidence register. |